Part 2: Cash from Chaos (Leaving the 20th century)

January 3rd, 2011 by Art Chantry

Macolm Mclaren was a hustler. Despite all his pretensions, he was at at heart a bone-hard Capitalist (read: “greedhead’). When he came back from his sojourn in Paris studying the erstwhile Situationists, he immediately walked away from his schooling and opened a haberdashery. Malcolm was also a bit of a sport, a dandy. He liked snappy clothes and fancied himself clever in their preparations.

He opened his shoppe and put his fashion designer wife (the soon-to-be-legend Vivienne Westwood) in charge of the new clothing designs. They started by selling vintage and repro/retro Teddy Boy gear. The Teddy Boys were an early British rockabilly subculture cult that prided itself on natty threads and a cultish love of stupidity. Malcolm fancied them as a sort of British situationist “no-culture” ideal. Beside, they looked cool. Malcolm always seemed to confuse rebel fashion with real rebellion.

Soon, he tired of that and moved into S&M gear (so naughty!), eventually calling his storefront at the dismal end of hipster King’s Row, simply “Sex.” It attracted the predictable array of underground sex addicts and fetishists. Soon a new sort of disaffected down-and-out youth began to hang out there, mostly because they liked the 45′s Malcolm played on his jukebox. He befriended the kids and began to try to figure out ways to take financial advantage of them. Many of them worked his shop for free just to get a new pair of shoes or whatever.

Soon, he had a small retinue of thieves and street urchins that were a regular part of his circle of entertainment. One kid, Steve Jones, managed to steal a rock band’s equipment truck and began to fancy himself a musician, since he now owned a guitar. That inspired Malcolm to have visions of world domination of the pop charts (money, money, money!). Soon a small group of losers were hashing out a few top forty cover tunes in his back room with the stolen gear.

Steve Jones was a lousy singer, so they all decided they needed a new front man. One street acquaintance was suggested and that was how John Lydon (aka, ‘rotten’) came into the picture. Now, John was a lousy singer, too, but what he lacked in talent, he more than made up in ferocious nasty personal style. The guy was a downright charismatic spit-flying shithammer. Malcolm liked that sort of thing. You can make money by creating a spectacle. Kids like spectacles. Besides, it made for a classic “situation,” ya know?

John Lydon was an interesting choice. As a young teenager, he suffered a life-threatening bout with meningitis. When he emerged from a coma, he found that his entire memory was wiped clean. His mother had to teach him how to do everything all over again – from scratch; eat, talk, tie his shoes, go the bathroom. The result was a near feral open eyed horrified critic of everything he encountered absolutely new. In a way, the guy was raised by wolves. As if “Chauncey Gardner” suddenly woke up and was furious about what he found. In other words, a situationist hero. All ready to go. And boy, did he GO!

All the elements were in place to take over the teen world – just a little dance band out to destroy the world. Malcolm had visions of creating social chaos with his little gang of frankensteins and getting a hit record and selling lots and lots of clothes. No joke. he really thought that would be the result. For a such a brilliant guy, he sure was dumb, eh?

Now, he needed some “branding” (which is a term that didn’t emerge until decades later), like some posters to advertise the concerts they were desperately trying to arrange. At first, Malcolm accessed the urchin kids hanging around his shop to do the work. Why waste good money on hiring a pro? Why not just do it yourself?

So he hired Helen Worthington-Smith, (whom you may remember as the dwarf character in “The Rock-n-Roll Swindle” film). Her initial efforts at creating posters for the band were so abysmally incompetent that it virtually became a new style on the streets of London. She used Xerox and letters cut out of newspaper pasted it all together while hanging a round the shop. The images were often S&M materials just sitting around in order catalogs. That is how she created the actual logo for the Sex Pistols.

Looking at her efforts sparked a recollection. Malcolm was taken by how “Situationist” those graphics looked. So, he got in touch with his old cohort Jamie Reid, who was also back in London. Figgered, why not? It all looks like crap anyway, eh? Maybe Jamie can add that controversial ignition point. Create a spectacle. Make it SELL!

Jamie Reid came back from his trip to Paris as a total anarchist situationsit convert (still unrepentant to this day). rule one of situationism is (no joke) “There is no such thing as situationism.” There is no organized thought, no clan, no community. All those things are ideas of the corrupt dead culture that has be destroyed. situationism sought ground zero.

On his return, Reid began working at a print shop and producing in his spare time an underground newsletter (virtually an early zine) called Suburban Press. He filled its pages with manifestos and diatribes and crummy anti-graphics and chaotic imagery. He began to pass these images off as “artwork.”

One “painting” he did at the time was a masterpiece called “The Nice Drawing.” In a cheap frame, Reid pasted a child’s drawing of a house above a clip-out photo of family eating a meal around the dinner table. Then, he pasted in everywhere little presstype words/descriptions of the scene – “nice people,” “nice room,” “nice yard,” “nice tulip,” “nice young man,” “nice photo,” etc. ad nauseam. It so completely slams modern life in so simple and snotty a way – any anybody could do it!

When Malcolm hired his buddy Jamie Reid to do the advertising (such as it was) for his little band project (with the crazy assholes in the band), Jamie went for the throat. He saw an opportunity to spread the word about his passion, and simply took much of his old design and art and propaganda work from his situationsist creeds and street speech broadsheets, then turned them into “ads.”

So many images that Reid did as situationist bumper stickers, graffiti, flyers, et al suddenly were selling rock and roll to the kids. He simply changed-out “culture’ for “Sex Pistols.” Yet, the message stayed intact: “Just buy this music and help destroy the world!” What could appeal more than that to frustrated teenage Brits? It was like chopping down trees, saplings. An ax swinging straight at the source. Think of the children!!

This image I’ve posted today is possibly Jamie Reid’s most iconographic piece. This 45 sleeve is cheaply produced and even more cheaply created. I once had the opportunity to hold the original paste-up for this piece in my hands. It was in a cheap broken picture frame (no glass) that had been sitting in the open somewhere for a very long time and it was gritty with dirt. Much of the newsprint used for the type was extremely yellowed. the edges of the paper in the paste-up had begun to peel up and the dirt and grime was caught under the edges it was right mess. It was perfect!

When this record hit the streets, the image managed to offend as many people as the music itself did. It was a foul frontal assault on the established culture order of English society. It was banned outright, yet it was the number one selling record in the country (there was simple blank spot at the top of the published record charts) and it came out on the silver jubilee of Queen Elizabeth’s reign!

The result of this song and this image was a virtual declaration of war on all things “punk” in general, the Sex Pistols in particular. A perfect trifecta! A “situation” created through spectacle and then the collapse of social order! Bingo! It was far more than Malcolm had bartered for (he just wanted money).  I think, however, that Jamie Reid was thrilled .

The finest aspect of Jamie’s work was that it essentially removed the craftsmanship from design. The unwritten goal of his thinking was to put himself out of business. His style was crude “anti-design,” that used garbage as resource and was totally DIY (Do it Yourself). There was no more need to hire a designer or an artist (or a musician or even instruments) – just DIY! When culture is erased, we all become creative by definition. Any level of competence was perfectly fine. It was an extremely radical design perspective in a world dominated by corporate control.

At this point in time, Britain was in economic collapse. There were riots in the streets, and even a huge garbage strike, so the entire city of London reeked of trash. There were even rat problems of historic proportions. Living London really sucked. And everyone was broke as well. It was perfect breeding ground for radical change (sound familiar?)…

There were no jobs, no opportunities. This record’s chanting mantra chorus of “No future, no future, no future for you” struck home and deep.
If you were “good” enough to pass the college exams, you got stuck in “art school.” Otherwise there was the dole. Pathetic. so, you partied and dreamed of a better world. That’s some pretty fertile territory.

When these kids began to understand the message that Jamie Reid’s design was screaming at them, they understood and they acted. What followed was a radical redirection of modern graphic design. It was actually a sort of cultural revolution.

Comment

Part 1: Detournement (The Beginning of the end)

December 30th, 2010 by Art Chantry

[This next topic I'm tackling is sorta big. In fact, it's so profoundly influential (yet completely ignored by graphic design history as it is taught) that I need to do it in three parts. So, the next three entries will be really all part of a single essay (sorta).  Sorry about that.]

Part 1: Detournement (The Beginning of the End)

The French practice philosophy like a sport. Their intellectually ferocious and convoluted attempts at viewing reality and living a good life have managed to cripple many generations of world thought. The two World Wars fought in Europe (most devastatingly in France) left several entire generations decimated (killed) and the survivors in a quandary over what to think about existence: “Wha’ happen?” and “Where next?” and “What the hell to do we do now?” and, of course, “What the fuck wazzat?”

So, it stands to reason that a number of the young intellectuals in Post-WW2 Era France would think it over and come up with some remarkably sordid and glum new twists on the idea of our shared reality. One such thinker was a fella name of Guy Debord. He drew off of a long history of anarchistic thinking that drew off eons of European history (particularly a small group called The Letterists, as well as the Dadaists).  Debord’s ideas were formally articulated as a philosophy called “Situationism.”

In a tiny nutshell, the base idea behind Situationism (simply put) was that human society and assumed reality were predicated on the “Shared Culture” inherited through many generations of tradition. Basically, the reason we ended up in those devastating wars was because the CULTURE itself was corrupt and pointless. In order to reach the desired nirvana, one had to somehow DIVORCE his/herself from that shared culture. Only then could we see existence clearly and live accordingly.

Just how does one remove culture from society’s shared existence? Well, by doing his/her best to destroy it. Such an act was known in their circles as “Detournement.” Simply put, abiders by the concept did their best to tear culture down in any way they could. Reduce it to a rubble and then whatever emerged was truth. Simple.

Debord went about this in many ways. He wrote manifestos – so fucked up due to the rejection of any rules of organization that they were virtually unintelligible. His writings were intentional chaos “designed” to confuse and alienate and force the reader to withdraw and reject. Keep in mind, he was a still a French Intellectual, a man of letters. He was educated and and refined, but preached total chaos.

One great example of his attempts at detournement was a film (remember – he’s French!) that was publicly screened only once. It caused a riot. The “movie” was 1/2 hour long; the first 15 minutes were completely blank, white, clear film, so the screen was utterly white light and blank (except the occasional specks of dirt). At precisely the 15 minute mark, the screen turned completely black – the film strip switched to solid black for the next 15 minutes (not that anybody made it all the way through). Youch.

The audience of sophisticated art snobs and refined culture mavens completely lost it. They threw their chairs at the screen and started destroying everything around them in disgust and anger. Debord was personally attacked. The police had to arrive and quell the disturbance. (Remember these are the French.)

This total in-your-face rejection of a film caused an angry chaotic reaction from the audience. Simply put, it created a “situation” – a total breakdown of societal norms and a “natural” reply of violence to grab for order and freedom. The “shared culture” literally flew out the window. The audience was “free.” The use of the “spectacle” as a major tool to create a “situation” was part of the ingrained actions conjured up by the philosophy of Debord’s Situationism.

That gives you an (admittedly rough) idea what the original Situationist master philosopher was about. His followers – those who really “got” what he was doing – followed suit and swarmed to his side becoming a sort of mad “gang” of Situationists, roving alone or in packs around Paris, getting completely wasted (an induced state of “non-culture”) and smashing cultural objects while shouting doctrine and intentionally confusing provocative slogans.

Pieces of art were made that were crazy stupid “Anti-Art” (drawing from Dadaist traditions) to provoke outrage. One artist created a book that had sandpaper covers, so that when placed on a library shelf among other books, would destroy the books next to it as it is removed and replaced on the shelf – thus destroying ‘culture’. (The image above is re-creation of such a book used as the program cover for a Situationist retrospective at the ICA gallery in London in the late 70′s.)

Granted, these situations were largely symbolic and isolated little events and objects. The original Situationists really had no idea how to bring their thinking to larger stage.

Ultimately, one Situationist activist attempted to kill the Pope – that great doorman of European Culture. He failed and he went to prison forever, but he was the ultimate Situationist hero (and utterly mad, to boot). Most of the other Situationists quickly devolved into street alcoholics and died young, staggering around the streets of 1950′s Paris until they died their pathetic “culture-free” deaths.

Guy Debord, on the other hand, lived a long life of ease, becoming a grand wazoo of philosophical intellectuals and the guru of cultural destruction and erasure, sitting in his easy chair, drinking his expensive wine while the rabble battled out his ideas on the street. It’s good to be a French philosopher, I guess.

His ideas fell from grace quickly and it all became remarkably obscure. That is, until a group of university students in Paris in the mid-sixties became enamored of his radical ideas and began to incorporate them into their counter culture politics. These students began campaigns of anti-establishment street politics that appeared to us Americans as echoes of our own riots of the same period, but it wasn’t the same at all.

Where our American student riots were fueled with anti-war, anti-bigotry, anti-establishment politics, the French students were coming from a somewhat different perspective. The intellectuals of the scene preached anti-culture and meant to see the entire fabric of French life torn asunder. They began to bring down the old world and institute, well, whatever happened, at least it would be “free.”

They began by doing acts of “detournement.” They would place signs in shops windows that would simply say “Special Today – Everything is Free!” The resulting onslaught of common shoppers grabbing everything and running out the door created the perfect situation. It destroyed the established order of doing business and caused total collapse instantaneously. These kids were smart.

One wonderful style of propaganda that emerged was the defacing of billboards and advertising with disruptive new ad slogans like, “The death of art spells the murder of artists. The real anti-artist appears.” Another favorite was the simple task of taking an existing popular comic strip (that staple of modern culture) and replacing the words in the balloons with dialog created to expose the falsity and utter lies of modern reality. This sort of activity and the wonderfully gafittied slogans (“Keep warm this winter – make trouble!” and, “Save petrol – burn cars!”and, “Believe in the ruins,”) created the social heartburn that only needed a spark.

It came to an ugly head with the 1968 student riots in Paris. We Americans think that these were riots like we had at home – unhappy draft dodgers and scruffy malcontents letting off a little steam, but the French riots were a bit more disturbing – they were Situationist riots. The goal was to bring down the entire culture of France. They lasted over a week. Today, we still look at the photographs of burned overturned cars littering the famous fragile streets of Paris with more than a little awe.

This “destructo” philosophical ideal also made it over the channel and popped up in 1960′s London with the “King Mob” movement. Riots and bomb-throwing exploded in London. “King Mob” were quickly arrested and the movement died, but it wasn’t forgotten.

In the early 1970′s a snotty, brilliant, and charming student traveled to Paris to do a study paper on the Situationists. He immediately hooked up with an old friend from back in London who had become deeply involved in the Situationists as more of a real life activity. The student was gathering ammo, while the “Artist” he met up with got actively involved with the actual creation of propaganda and artwork and street actions in the dismal dregs of the Situationist movement.

That was how Malcolm Mclaren partnered up with Jamie Reid.

Stay tuned for Part Two: Cash From Chaos

Comment

T-Shirts: Ubiquitous as Belly Buttons

December 27th, 2010 by Art Chantry

The unfortunate origins of the t-shirt in America begin with slavery. The t-shirt was cheap easy field work clothing (light, breathable cotton, two shaped panels sewn together). In fact, the earliest recorded image applied to a t-shirt seems to be the slave number stenciled onto the cotton t-shirt. Imagine that. The t-shirt of today owes its origins to such a sad and inhumane past, but that’s America for you, always making lemonade (large angry groan at stupid ‘Candide’ joke).

Anyway, as the t-shirt worked its way into our culture – first as slave wear, then as work wear, eventually as underwear, and finally as high fashion statement – the one element that really was the driving force of the wearability and sustenance of the t-shirt phenomena was the grapic ON THE FRONT of the shirt.

After its beginning with the vile slave identification number application, the t-shirt quickly drifted into sportswear. It became just as easy to apply a team name and a team number as a slave number/ID. So slavery still exists in America in the symbolic form of organized sports? I guess that’s one way to look at it.

The military – the biggest sports team of all – quickly adapted the t-shirt as well. First it was cheap underwear, then it was as division identification. Very soon thereafter, you began to see the application of team mascot and insignia imagery, but it wasn’t very common until the advent of massive use during WW2. It was the displaced war vet who really brought the illustrated t-shirt into popular acceptance. When you joined a post-war sports team or biker club or street gang, suddenly the military system of identification was applied – it was all they knew. That’s how we got gang colors.

About the same time this peacetime innovation of club insignia took hold, the custom car hotrodders were taking notice of the work of Von Dutch. He was innovating the rebirth of the art of pinstriping in a new crazy way. He was adding pinstriping as a high expressive form, doing “fine art” pieces on fast moving vehicles. It soon became known as “dutching” and was not only cool looking, it was considered good luck to be dutched by Dutch. It became a subcultural fad and status symbol.

As others began to copy his success (good money) Von Dutch stepped up his efforts and applied his pinstriping work to damn near anything, including his own wardrobe. This created interest in pinstriped (with an airbrush rather than a brush) clothing. The ideal canvass was the t-shirt.

Von Dutch, being a painter as well (among so many other things) immediately began trying his hand at creating hot rod images on clothing. He had already been adding little mythical beasts and hot rod monster images in his pinstriping. Air brushing them onto t-shirts was a logical step. Soon, he couldn’t keep up with the demand.

The airbrushed monster on t-shirts was Von Dutch’s innovation. In effect, it was the very first time anybody had actually applied full born illustration/art to t-shirts. Granted, team (and military division) insignia had been silkscreened to t-shirts before, but Von Dutch was the first guy to use a blank white t-shirt as a canvas for airbrushed original artwork. Later, Ed Roth took the obvious step of applying the mass-production technique of silkscreening those previously airbrushed monsters to t-shirts to sell en masse.

As a result, every single t-shirt sold in america literally owes a royalty to these two graphic innovators. One was a visionary artist pioneering a new medium. The other was a commercial hustling genius art directing an innovation for profit – the classic American success story. Too bad they didn’t bother to patent anything…

Since then, the t-shirt has become as American as apple pie. Everybody in the entire world seems to have owned an illustrated t-shirt at one time or another. No one is free of it. They are as ubiquitous as belly buttons. Think of all the tour t-shirts alone. There must have been billions of them produced since the 1960′s. And the commercial shirt and the advertising shirts and the team shirts. It’s really an endless (and endlessly dismissed) medium.

So, where are these shirts now? One of the interesting things about t-shirts is how recyclable they are. Most old tshirts traditionally went into the rag picking business where they were torn up for commercially available cotton rags. Workers would carefully remove the back panels (sometimes several out of a single t-shirt) and generally toss out the image area. landfill. That’s why old t-shirts – especially rock tour t-shirts – have become such a big collector’s field. Almost none of them survived.

Another innovation in t-shirt technology first started to pop up during the 1960′s. It was called the “iron-on” t-shirt. It was a process of transferring a purchased image printed on a special wax-like paper and was sold via mail order and eventually t-shirt iron-on shops. The basic premise that you could purchase the pre-printed design of your choice and then use your own iron to adhere the image to the t-shirt of your choice (or sometimes the shop would iron it on for you). It proved so popular and profitable (no middle man, no silkscreen printing) that it almost entirely wiped out the old format silkscreen t-shirt.

The images could be stupid (think happy faces, mushrooms, rainbows) or cool (like this image I reproduce – a generic monster image a la Ed Roth). Either way they were unavoidable. It became one of the style signifiers of the 1970′s – its most popular period. We now associate these natty plastic iron-on images with things like the Brady Bunch or disco queens. The iron-on materials (in order to prevent washout in the laundry and increase color intensity and other gimmicky production values like glitter) eventually became big flat plastic slabs glued to the chest of your shirt. you’d often sweat underneath them and in teenagers particularly, that meant pimples. so you’d get a zitty chest. Ugh!

The one thing that iron-ons could NOT do was manufacture large runs. The iron-on technology still maintained that one-by-one personal approach that really couldn’t accommodate large editions in the tens or hundreds of thousands. Gradually, as the name brand again began to dominate our clothing decisions, the silkscreened image began to re-emerge as the dominant technology of the t-shirt. Better profits, ya know?

So, today, the iron-on is almost extinct. The only thing that keeps it alive is the avid collector of period clothing (often rock clothing). These collectors will even commission new editions of old designs and thereby inadvertently keep the iron-on technology alive.

The other bit of innovation (again) that keeps iron-on alive is the “home job” t-shirt. Basically it’s a process that allows you to print out iron on t-shirts of your own choosing/design right on your home desktop printer. You simply a print it out, iron it on and viola! Your own t-shirt! It could be a pic of your dog or a drawing by your kid.

So, the iron-on isn’t dead, it’s merely resting. I imagine some genius out there will start making some sort of image that can only properly be done with the iron-on technology and will start a fad that will (at least temporarily) make iron-on tshirts all the rage again. myself? I can’t wait.

Comment

The Late, Great Don Martin

December 23rd, 2010 by Art Chantry

Recognize this illustrator? You should. He’s one of the most famous cartoon/humorist illustrators of the last half century. Most of us grew up reading and laughing at this guy’s work. This is what his stuff looked like before we ever saw him, though. He was a Hipster Jazz Beatnik Fella who did a lot of images for jazz record covers and for jazz magazines like “down beat” and the like. He was One Cool Dude. His name was Don Martin. Yeah, THAT Don Martin.

These images (along with many others I’ve collected) are classic Don Martin humor. It depicts a lock step line-up of uniform hipster beat jazz saxmen rushing off, seen from the front. Turn the page and the second image was printed exactly on the backside of the sheet were the first image sat. It shows the same lock step line-up of uniform sax layers speeding off into the distance. That’s extremely sophisticated and knowledgeable wit to see in a spot illustration from any period. thinking like that is almost non-existent today.

I collect old magazines and I especially love obscure jazz stuff. It’s like finding a tracer bullet through the underground of the Fifties. So many loose ends and relationships and early careers can be found in old jazz-related publishings that it’s a mother lode of American underground culture. The stuff never really sold well at the time, so it’s all obscure. Not much of it was made and a miniscule amount of it survived. That was the world Don Martin lived in. Until he got hired by MAD magazine.

I’m not sure which issue was of MAD featured the first appearance of Don Martin (I could easily look it up, but don’t want to bother), but he became synonymous with the magazine. Don Martin was eventually christened “MAD’s Maddest Cartoonist” and the billing stuck. His work was so attached to MAD that it became a symbiotic relationship – neither ever really recovered from the divorce. When they split the relationship (unhappily) neither Don Martin nor MAD were ever quite as good ever again. Sometimes these things work like that. It’s as if they never really realize how special a working relationship is (rocky though it may be) until it’s in the past and can be seen without all the emotional baggage that may be attached.

One of the big problems with MAD was the talent involved were all working in a contractual relationship called “work for hire.” That’s a legal term that sounds innocuous and actually rather descriptive of what a freelancer does – they work for pay (hire), but that’s almost the opposite of what the legal meaning of that phrase actually delivers. Through many years of court cases and legal hearings and long term battles, the legal term “work for hire” means that the guy doing the hiring gets everything and you get some agreed-upon amount of money – period. Basically, they get all credit, authorship, copyright, everything. You can’t even claim you touched it. The client gets to put his name on the finished piece and reap all reward coming. In fact, it’s the system long established in the commercial art industry (hundreds of years) called “The Studio System.” Whoever’s name is on the door gets it all. You just happen to be a wage slave. Literally.

What’s even worse about “work for hire” is that the phrase covers ALL of your work during the period covered by the contract. So, everything you do creatively is also technically legally owned by the client. The guy who invented “post-it” notes came up with it on his own time in his own basement with his own stuff, but 3M got the patent/copyright/control and all the money – just because he worked there during his daylight time. They just gave the guy a small bonus and a pat on the back, I guess.

That, sadly, holds true technically for anybody who signs a “work for hire” contract. Anything you do for another client or on your own time during the same period covered is also owned outright by the “work for hire” client. I’ve never seen this enforced by a client in my direct experience, but it has and does happen, more often that you’d dare imagine.

This situation happened to all the MAD guys. It also happened to all the PLAYBOY magazine illustrators, and several other famous magazines. The lawyers simply added the phrase “work for hire” in that teeny tiny small print you see on the back of checks. So when you cash they check, your signature is applied to a contract and then they gotcha. they own your work and your life. It’s only a matter of time in this current economic/hustle atmosphere we currently live in before we start to see these rules applied to us freelance people. Too much money to be made for them sleazy corporate lawyers to ignore. I always read my contract and cross out the words “work for hire” before I sign them. It always freaks out the lawyers and I often lose the contract as result, but I figger it’s worth it. I still have my “career.”

In Don Martin’s case, he wasn’t so careful – or maybe he was just innocent and naive, but he cashed those checks for decades. When he angrily split with MAD, he found out that he lost all control of all his original work he did for the magazine. Furthermore, because he had worked almost exclusively for them for so long that they became symbiotically identified with each other, he lost the right to use his own name. He also (technically) lost the right to even draw images that looked like his stuff (but that was too hard for the corporate guys to enforce). When Warner Brothers bought MAD magazine, they bought the rights to Don Martin’s name with it. They sold all his original drawings at a huge auction and made an awful lot of money. None of it went to Don Martin. Remember that animated cartoon strip that showed up in the early days of the WB network? It was done entirely without his involvement and he never got a penny from it – even though his name was plastered all over it. Just the facts. Copyright laws are not written to protect artists – they’re written to protect corporate interests. Honest, it’s absolutely true (So, all you little purity heads out there thinking you own your own work better look again…).

This was not only Don Martin’s problem. Many famous illustrators ran into the same thing. Patrick Nagel became so closely identified with PLAYBOY magazine that when his widow tried to sell some of his old prints, corporate PLAYBOY stomped on her and sued her for what they legally claimed as their property. She counter sued and they counter sued back. I don’t know how that one finally ended (winners switched from side to side), but it’s not uncommon to see. I know of several cases where very tiny unknown illustrators working on tiny unknown clients have legally lost their right to even draw – all because a misguided client was trying to protect their interests. It actually happens a lot and goes virtually unreported in the very trade magazines that this industry actually depends upon for information like this. Such is the state of the “Design Industry” today – utterly useless.

Back in the late 80s, I hired Don Martin to do a cover for The Rocket (the Christmas issue). Through connections, I was able to track him down living in Florida. I had to deal through his current wife, who managed him (and you know what that can be like), but I eventually talked to him directly on the phone. He was SO cool! I told him about The Rocket, and he shut me up saying he already knew all about The Rocket. He loved the magazine. I was very surprised, because The Rocket was only distributed around the Seattle environs and a only few issues were drop-shipped to a few locations around the country. It was testament to his hipness that he actually knew the magazine at the other completely extreme tip of the nation. How did he do that?

He was actually excited to do the cover. Even though we could only offer him something like $400 (or some piddling amount like that) to do an image, he frankly needed the money. He had just undergone double retina transplant surgery and was in recovery. I actually felt guilty. I think I actually forked over a few extra bucks out of my own pathetic salary to seed the pay.

The image he sent was a b&w line drawing of the classic manger scene, with the Virgin Mary holding up her (Christ) child to poor Joseph, who has the expression of the completely befuddled “who knew” expression of a doltish fella whose virgin wife had just surprisingly given birth to some other guy’s kid. It was adult, daring and hilarious. I colored it using rubylithe overlay work by hand (how it was done back then) building up the primary 4-color inks.

It turned out smashing. I’ll try to find a repro of it and post in a follow-up post. The public reaction? ANTI-SEMETIC!!! We got letters saying that it was a slap at Jewishness to have Joseph look like a schmuck like that. We all laughed even harder. Who knew?? We all felt like Joseph in the drawing.

Comment

Sugar-Coated Nothings and Cigarettes

December 20th, 2010 by Art Chantry

Meet Joe the Camel. He’s the most famous camel who ever lived. “Old Joe” was a featured performer – a big star! – at the Barnum & Bailey Circus for a long long time, up until his untimely death in a trainwreck. People came from all over the country to see Old Joe. Maybe a dromedary camel was still so weird that folks didn’t know what to expect? More likely P.T. Barnum came up with some unbelievably believable hucksterism BS to drag the rubes in to witness the beast. I really don’t know, but Old Joe was star, pure and simple.

Back in 1913, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco was coming up with a new brand of cigarettes (aimed at womenfolk) and were looking for a good moniker to hang on it. Something timely and popular. Something exotic and fuzzy. What to do…. What to do….

Coincidentally, the circus had just passed through Winston-Salem, NC and everybody was still smitten with Old Joe. So, they approached the circus folks to ask to photograph Joe for their package. PT must not have been the guy they talked to, because they actually said,”No!” Imagine PT Barnun saying NO to free publicity like that?

Anyway, the R.J. Reynolds management cleverly bought a block of tickets and let their entire company’s employees out of work for a day to go to the circus. That convinced the powers that be, and Old Joe became the “JOE CAMEL” of legend.

Of course, many many campanies have created cartoon characters of their trademarks over the years. Think of Charlie Tuna or the Hamm’s Bear or even the Campbell Kids. It’s an endless list of pop cartoon marketeers (or perhaps, “mouseketeers”, dare I say?) and think about breakfast cereals! How many of those cartoon trademarks became Saturday morning television cartoon shows to coerce the chilluns into going psycho until mommy bought the latest sugar coated nothing for them? I mean, it’s as American as apple pie. (Say, isn’t there even a cartoon character for apple pie, too? Isn’t it called “grandma?”).

Selling cigarettes and booze and all sorts of vice to the children (oh my!) seemed to not be a problem for most of the history of western civilization. I have seen adverts in boy scout manuals featuring a young Ronald Reagan promoting cigarettes to boy scouts as “good healthy living” that feels good and makes you sleep better (improves digestion, too!) seems crazy in this day and age, but not then. “What’s good for business is good for America!”

Then the hippie/yuppie PC nazi busybodies took over the pop culture and suddenly we banned all this sort of thing. That is banned, unless you are clever enough to slip around the rules and still get after the loose change in those kids’ pockets. Just look at Budweiser, et al.

So, when madman Mike Salisbury (the guy who originally defined the Rolling Stone magazine public visual personality as well as the youth sportswear clothing line of “Gotcha” (and so many other famous campaigns) was hired to make a cartoon version of the camel cigarettes trademark, he came up with the hipster “Joe Camel” (aging star of stage and screen and circus). So what? Seemed just like another hack corporate piece of crap to me. Spuds MacKenzie was doing the same already. It was as common as mud.

But, somehow, it caught the pop consciousness of the moment and suddenly Joe Camel and even Mike Salisbury became the devil personified. The charge against Camel cigarettes, that staunch old warhorse (warcamel?) brand became a symbol of all the evils of the corporate greed head mindset. The entire world was ready to to tar and feather Joe Camel. It was a media frenzy.

Poor old Mike Salisbury came under attack as well (naturally), but in everything I read, he didn’t ever seem to actually understand what the big deal was all about. He actually seemed to think that the whole giant frenzied stink up was great success. It meant he did it right. It was the stuff of advertising legend.

To this day, I really have no idea what the whole “Joe Camel Is Evil” thing was about. I’m sure there will be many morally superior people, utterly brimming over with hubris, jumping in here to explain it to me, but I think it was a tempest in a teacup. A red herring. A complete misdirection of more serious matters. It sort of reminds me of the recovered memory/satanic ritual abuse scandal happening around the same time. The Reagan years had us all so paranoid that we saw the devil under every rock and hiding under our refrigerators, as well. I guess sorta like today, right?

So far as I know, the whole Joe Camel campaign was yanked out of the pop culture because of this ridiculous overreaction. Salisbury’s career was smeared like HE had been tar & feathered and not just the cartoon. He just did his job and did it well. Even today, with zero cigarette advertising anywhere to be seen, kids smoking is on the rise, but, HEY! I though it was all Joe Camel’s fault. What gives? What do you think, Lindsay Lohan?

But, for a short time, Mike Salisbury got to play “The Evilest Man in the World.” He got to be “Mr. Burns” for a minute. I don’t know if he even realizes it.

I’d personally give a lot to have had that opportunity, just for that second. What a hoot!

Comment

Fads in Typography

December 16th, 2010 by Art Chantry

Right now we’re going through a huge fad of handwritten lettering. I think it was inspired by a couple of books recently published – volumes of handwritten typography (one is actually titled “Hand Job”). It seemed to come at exactly the right moment and hit the right nerve. I think we’re all so burned out on that crappy stuff that any boob can do on a computer that sorta passes for “graphic design” that we have all instinctively gravitated backwards toward the crude hand-rendered stuff that CANNOT be done by a computer program. It seems that the only way to show any personality in the contemporary design world is to completely erase the mechanical mind from the finished piece (or at least the appearance of it). It’s sort of the triumph of DIY in design. Draw something really really crudely (the badder the bedder) and scan it into your design work straight across.

The lettering is everywhere and it’s undeniably the “look of the teens.” It will be as distinctly linked to this era in time as David Carson’s look is linked to the 1990′s or “New Wave” design is linked to the 1980′s. It’s actually become a FAD.

There is something magical and revealing about handwriting. In the past, I would often take the handwritten liner notes or instructions that a client gives me and copy it directly into a design. That usually upsets the client to no end, because they always think their handwriting is terrible and if they had a chance to do it over, they’d “do it much nicer” for me. That’s the catch. If they are forewarned that the calligraphy they create is going to be reproduced, they choke. They TRY to make it look like “nice handwriting” or calligraphy or lettering or whatever they seem to think it is SUPPOSED to look like – and it’s all wrong. I want the personality of their HAND to come through. The first thing they do when they TRY to do NICE work is erase themselves – every time.

So, i have a deep fondness for the sheer humanity of handwritten communications. The way it looks usually speaks much louder than what is actually said in the writing. I try to capture that human-ness as often as I can.

This is Albert Hoffman’s autograph. This is a photocopy that (I believe) Dennis P. Eichhorn gave to me about 20 years ago. He was in an airport and bumped into the esteemed scientist. Leave it to Denny to actually recognize him.

Albert Hoffman was the man who “Discovered” LSD. How would you like to do autographs like this? He actually draws a diagram of a molecule of acid! Pretty wild, eh? He actually had bragging rights to it. I’m not sure what the other items written below indicate (perhaps the date of his discovery? I dunno).

One of my favorite displays at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is a weird back wall in the music hall that reproduces all the inductees autographs etched into the wall. Ever wonder what Stevie Wonder’s autograph looks like?

Comment

Awesome Crappy Cat Poster

December 13th, 2010 by Art Chantry

This little poster is from the mid 1970′s, back when I was a student still attending Western Washington State College (later “University”) in Bellingham, Washington. That’s a town about 60 miles from the Canadian border in the very northwest corner of the United States. Basically, it’s one of those end-of-the-world places where you can run no further and still be in the United States.

Bellingham is a town full of weirdoes pretending to live like normal folks. Eccentrics and oddballs kinda pile up there like an eight ball rolling toward the corner pocket. Then they begin to fester. The result is a steady stream of interesting subculture dribbling forth like an oozing sore.

Actually, I make it sound horrible, but in fact, it’s just the opposite. Until the micro-yuppies turned that small town into an unliveably expensive retirement community, Bellingham was one of those “Center of the Unknown Universe” cities that spawned an enormous amount of popular American pop culture – and nobody knew. Kerouac wrote about it. People like Country Joe MacDonald or Joan Baez might pop into a local tavern and sing a few songs for free beer. Patty Hearst lived there for a spell while she was on the lam with the SLA. Robert Deniro could walk down the street and be ignored. Many famous session musicians had farms in the region and would regularly play on the open mic nights. It made for the best garage bands ever.

Everything that Seattle became famous for in the 1990′s actually came from the surrounding cities like Bellingham, Tacoma, Olympia, Aberdeen, etc., etc. It’s actually been that way for most for the last 50 years – very little really cool stuff comes FROM Seattle. It comes from the northwest and launches itself through the “local big city” – Seattle. That’s the dynamic of the northwest. In the much older “olden days,” Seattle talent and culture had to launch itself through the next closest “big city” – San Francisco or Los Angeles. At least that’s finally changed.

Anyway, this is a little cheapo poster advertising an art show at the small college “Student Gallery” (the place I had my very first solo exhibit almost 35 years ago) in the student center (the “Viking Union”). Fairhaven was a small semi-independent satellite college within the larger state college framework that originally was designed as an experimental school back in the 60s. It was an unstructured learning environment – a “hippie college.” You could literally give YOURSELF a master’s degree in underwater basket weaving if you so desired. No grades necessary. No supervision, either. Crazy to think about today, eh?

The result was a nest of weirdo underground culture that produced an awful lot of innovation mixed with utter dross. Hilarious and wonderful at the same time. By the time I encountered the separate and beautiful “micro campus” of Fairhaven College, it had been re-absorbed into the mainstream academic world, but was still treated as a special “alternative” case. Nowadays, it’s simply another dormatory.

So, this “Fairhaven Workshop” exhibit advertised on this little poster still meant innovation and outsider talent when it happened, and it literally was full of hippie shit – and also of amazing twisted thinking as well. Several of the people in the exhibit went on to peculiar and important careers – including one fella who found an old animation stand in the school basement and taught himself animation. By the time he showed at this exhibit, he had gotten ahold of a very early primitive computer and was literally creating very early versions of computer generated animation. This was in 1975! He later went on to work for George Lucas on Star Wars and became part of Industrial Light and Magic Empire. A total geeky hippie genius.

I grabbed this little poster because I thought (and still think) it’s totally wonderful. It’s printed on the same crappy army surplus a.b. dick 360 printing press that all of my earliest posters were printed on. It was in the student print shop and was run by Fairhaven hippie students trying to teach themselves how to print things. The quality is crappy and craftsy all in one tidy bundle, as only total amateur craftsmen can create. It’s deliciously bad printing.

I used to know the woman who drew this kitty illustration, but I’ve completely forgotten her name. I never encountered her again after school days, so I have no idea what happened to her, but her wonderful naive/moderne arty image of a cat stuck with me for years. I thought this “I can’t draw” drawing style (she could draw beautifully, by the way) was brilliant unlike anything I’d ever seen before. It was completely alien, totally new. It was the sort of drawing that the academic world – particularly back then – frowned upon and even openly and loudly criticized. This was a daring image for the period.

This was at the very beginning of punk in the northwest. I’d just seen my first punk-style posters hanging on walls. When this popped up I realized it was from the same turf, but a more art oriented interpretation. People tend to forget that in the earliest days of punk, it was largely created by “art” students and not lunkheaded know-nothing buffoons. Punk was delicate and humorous and utterly snide back then. It actually still had “charm.” So, this little kitty captivated me.

After I left Bellingham and moved to the local “big city market” (Seattle) for my design “career,” I began to encounter many more folks working in this naive punky “any skill level is perfectly acceptable” style of imagery. I saw Gary Panter’s work and Lynda Barry’s drawings and the stuff coming out of the Olympia and “OP Magazine” scene. In fact, I actually thought all of these images being created by the woman who had drawn that kitty. I couldn’t quite get my mind around the idea that all of this weird and visually shocking (for then) artwork wasn’t the output of one solo artist.

Strange to remember, but when a new innovative and challenging style (like this) first erupts, we tend to want to (in our limited minds) credit everything new we see to a single person as the creator. It somehow allows us to accept what we’re looking at a little easier. We’re not so “afraid” of it – it’s just a single crackpot at work. And, yes, this style being introduced back then was first seen as a threat. It literally scared people. Total strangers would attack these posters and images and tear them up in horror. No joke. I saw it happen many times.

Later, when we finally figure out that it’s not a single “great man” creating this new wave, but the work of a more generalized but outsider subculture that we finally begin to understand what’s happening. Then we begin to try it, too. We begin to participate. Eventually it becomes old school. It’s how this stuff works.

1 Comment

Edward Gorey and Faulty Equations

December 9th, 2010 by Art Chantry

Edward Gorey is so famous at this point, that I hardly need to even mention him here. Everybody already knows his work so well. He’s as universally admired as Charles Addams for his peculiar and often bizarre sentiments. However, not a lot of people are aware of his early career.

This is a direct shout out to Jesse Reyes, who turned me on to Gorey’s early work.  Jesse (and his partner, Amy) collect a LOT of cool stuff.  Among their cool junk is a rather extensive (attempting completist) collection of early Gorey. Apparently, a LOT of people collect Gorey, judging from the prices on e-bay.

Gorey, when he was a struggling young artist, spent time working at a publishing house (alongside a handful of other now-known designer/artists) cranking out book cover designs for all sorts of junky stuff. I’ve found covers, jackets, even title typography (adorning other folk’s illustrations) executed by Gorey. I’ve even found books “art directed” by Edward Gorey that have none of his illustration of lettering in evidence. He was simply directing other folks’ work.

Hard to imagine, actually – Edward Gorey as a young, struggling artist. He just seems to be such a huge icon that the thought of him taking on dang near any work to survive seems improbable. Fame does not equal wealth, however. Even the Beatles and the Stones and Bowie were broke at the very peak of their careers. It’s a misconception in our culture that fame=wealth.

Anyway, I gather this stuff and send these along to Jesse and Amy periodically to see if they can add them to their stash. This is my latest find. It’s a “children’s” book of Rumpelstiltskin (no Gorey book is entirely for children). It’s chock full of cool Gorey interpretations of the story.

What I find interesting is that’s it’s in color. I don’t remember ever seeing a color Gorey piece before. It’s kinda weird. Sometimes color is not better. Many times, I’ve designed a piece in b&w only to have the client get excited and decide that “color is better! color sells!” and destroy the whole design. This looks badly colorized, like one of those early colorized vintage movies that Turner Broadcasting did. Yucky.

Frankly, if you can’t design in b&w, you can’t design, and color doesn’t really help much. It seldom is a solution by itself. Even more rarely does it fix a bad image, and it can ruin a good image, especially if that image was intended by the creator as a b&w piece.

A great example is that move “The Mist” (based on a Stephen King novella). It was originally intended to be a b&w film, but the money interests (using that hoary old notion of “color=better”) insisted on shooting it in color. So the director did both. The b&w white version is available only on a specific limited DVD edition of the film as a “director’s cut,” but it’s well worth hunting down. It’s really a completely different (and hugely better) movie in b&w. It was written as a b&w movie by a visual artist using graphic design language. We all know this language, but we often override it as suspect. Dunno why. It’s a great and true language.

I think this Gorey cover – executed in color – looks like crap. It’s a really great illustration ruined by the demands of the publisher – a publisher with enough vision to hire Gorey in the first place, but not enough integrity or courage to allow him to actually do his work. Sound familiar?

Funny, huh? This is sorta “Crappy Gorey.”

1 Comment

December 6th, 2010 by Art Chantry

Mike Calkins posted a rather special item here on my FB™ page a while back that I want to talk about. He found it posted on a site called “Dangerous Minds” (a remarkably appropriate name).

This weird ad was placed in a number of Marvel comic books in 1967 (I saw it in an issue of “Strange Tales,” but this repro comes from an issue of “Daredevil”). It advertises the latest release by the Mothers of Invention titled, “We’re Only in It for the Money” (critically praised as one of the very best albums of all time, if you believe that crap). Frank Zappa demanded total control of everything and took the entire promotional budget for this release (I forget the label, but it was a major label) and then sank it into adverts in comic books. Everybody was aghast, but the man knew his audience, ya know?

This ad was created by one of my all time heroes of graphic design – Cal Schenkel. He did all of those covers for the Mothers of Invention and early Zappa records, as well as work for Captain Beefheart and the GTOs and Wild Man Fischer. Basically, he was the house artist at Zappa, Inc.

I was one of those weird kids who didn’t do sports, but collected comics and ended up listening to Frank Zappa records instead. At first, I didn’t understand the music (it took me ten years to actually sit through an entire playing of Beefheart’s “Trout Mask Replica” – I just couldn’t handle it), but I was instinctively grabbed by the images on the covers. Schenkel’s art was to take everything he could find and then break it and fuck it up and then use it in improbable ways. Looking at his work opened my eyes to impossible possibilities. I’m still trying to figure out exactly how he created some of that stuff. I show others, experts in their fields, and they are puzzled as well. He seemed to be tapping into some otherworldly technovision or something.

Finding Cal Schenkel was one of those “moments” that everybody experiences in their lives – transitional awakenings. They’re called “epiphanies.” Calvin was an epiphany for me. He’s the one that defined my sardonic sense of humor (a nice way of saying “snarky”), he sold me forever on collage as expression and, most of all he turned me on to using mistakes and rubbish as means to a glorious end.

This little ad was my epiphany. Tripping across it in 1967 (I was how old? 13?) literally blew my mind. I read it and read it and stared at it. I didn’t get it. It took me a very long time to figure out it was selling a record. I had no idea what it was about. The blobby cartoon style (ala, Peter Max, Heinz Edelmann, Milton Glaser, and all those nameless psychedelic artists – all unknown to me at the time) was so clumsy and beautiful that it looked like it was done by somebody addled or disabled. The hand drawn copy – “Cleans you! Thrills you! Cleans & thrills you!” – was so weird and snotty and cute that I still use it now, 50 years later. It was like a window to another universe. What did this all mean?

What it meant to me, of course, was not the importance of the actual SALE that was being rather badly attempted, but the impact was the way it looked. Cal Schenkel was using bits and pieces from another culture to break my perceptions open to possibilities. It was the hook of “the other.” He was actually selling me another way to view my reality, and it was ok. It was in a comic book!

This is where I learned that design is language. This is where it was first presented to me in such a dramatic fashion. From this point on, I looked at all the images around me a little differently, leading down the path to what I later became (whatever that is).

I spent my time today digging through cultural detritus, examining and learning forgotten visual languages and absorbing them into my vocabulary. When I “write” in the this language of graphic design, all that crap I learned comes back out as part of my dialog, my accent, my dialect. It has become part of my make-up. But, then, that happens to everybody, but we seldom note it. We are a collection of crap that has been “presented” to us (shoved into our faces, rammed down our throats). We learn it and we repeat it and we become it.

Here’s another Cal Schenkel piece that was extremely important to me. “Uncle Meat” was one of the projects where I learned virtually everything I needed to know about graphic design. The rest of my education has been mere window dressing. Yup, you really can learn that much from “reading” something written in graphic design “language.”

It was was Cal Schenkel that I learned to AWARE of that process, to attempt to use it, to manipulate it. I learned the “art form” of graphic design language from Cal. I thank him endlessly.

Comment

Before He Took Off: Ron Hauge at The Rocket

December 2nd, 2010 by Art Chantry

The other day, I spent some time talking about Lynda barry and her early days at The Rocket in Seattle. One of the things that was so important about that magazine was that it was an outlet for an underground population to find each other. There has always been a dark bohemian underground in the northwest – it’s part of the nature of living in ‘the corner’ of the United States: you can’t go no further away and still be here.

Seattle was full of weirdoes – musicians, writers, dancers, actors, painters, sidewalk screamers, politicos, lefties, wobblies, religious nutjobs, the works. The stuff that has leaked out of the northwest over the decades reads like a a “who’s who” of crackpot culture and high strangeness. People who live in Seattle generally tout its livability and clean fresh yuppie vision, but the real story of the northwest dwells in deeper darker places.

When The Rocket emerged in Seattle, nothing was going on. Sure, there were a few isolated punk rock music things happening here and there, but nothing all that noticeable. There were some rerun movie houses, some alternative art space galleries, a few community theaters, but there were a LOT of folks living in Seattle looking for a place to fly their freak flags.

The Rocket became the new underground kiosk to these people. Over the years, it became the only place for these folks to practice their craft, their ART, and find a forum, reach their community. They did it for free, nobody really got paid much. The idea was it was a place for all the untapped, ignored and otherwise invisible talent that for generations had been utterly pushed away into a dirty dark wet corner of the untied states. The northwest was a place were talented oddballs went to fester.

Ron Huage was one of those guys. I have no idea where he popped up from. Most of the cliques at made up The Rocket emerged from some general regions or territories. There were University of Washington people, Evergreen College factions. There were folks that came from Idaho or Reno or Walla Walla. There were cliques from inside the city as well. There was the U-District gangs, the East Side Metal Heads, the Tacoma Losers, the West Seattle Punks (the tough guys). I have no idea which one of these many many cliques was the one Ron Hauge emerged from – or if he just walked in out of the blue on his own two feet.

Before Lynda Barry took over as the “unofficial staff cartoonist,” that totally undefined role was invented by Ron Hauge. Basically, whenever there was a little left over space to fill up in a column or a “house” advert that needed doing or an illustration or creative design that was floating unwanted, the “unofficial staff cartoonist” did it. They were sort of the expected fixer of dead space and unclaimed projects.

In payment (aside form a puny insultingly small check) he got his name in the staff box and found a place to practice his art. He was also given a running regular space to fill with a gag panel style cartoon. This is one of my favorites for the earliest Rocket days when he did these wacked out cartoons. Car seat stuffing? Still makes me crack up, almost 35 years later. Go figger.

I never met Ron Hauge. He left long before I ever got involved with the Rocket. I never heard anybody really talk about him, either. He was just “that guy who did all those cool drawings” in the earliest days of The Rocket. He took off and that was that, but I still look at his old work with admiration. He was natural talent. When he left, the void was filled by Lynda Barry – that should tell you how big a hole he left behind.

Later he became head writer and then executive producer of a TV show called “The Simpsons.”

Comment

Garbageman

Rummaging through the piles of print with a man who made lots of it.

Filed under: Activism, Advertising, Albert Hoffman, Anonymous, Anti-Graphics, Art Books, Art Chantry, Art Deco, Art Nouveau, Artistis' Woes, Batmobile, Beach Culture, Beistle Company, Black & White v. Color, book covers, Books, Buzzcocks, Cal Schenkel, cars, Cary Loren, Commercial Art, copy-cats, costume design, Courtney Love, Cushenberry, Dave Crider, David Carson, David Stairs, Design, Destroy All Monsters, DIY, Don Martin, Dragula, drawing, early works, Ed Roth, Edward Gorey, Estrus Records, Fairhaven, Famous Monsters, Flying Saucer, Frank Kozik, Frank Lloyd Wright, Frank Zappa, Fromage, Garage, Gary Panter, George Barris, Gibby Haynes, Graphic Branding, graphic design, Graphics, Halloween, Handwriting, Harry Chester, Heinz Edelmann, Helen Worthington-Smith, Holly Tuttle, Illustration, iron-on, Jaime Hernandez, James Stark, Jamie Reid, Jim Blanchard, Jim Shaw, Jimi Hendrix, Joe Camel, John Alcorn, kustom kars, label makers, Lynda Barry, MAD Magazine, Malcom Garrett, Malcom Mclaren, Marcel Duchamp, Maurice Sendak, MC5, Michael Dougan, Mike Kelley, Mike Salisbury, Milton Glaser, Monkeemobile, Monsters, Patrick Nagel, Paula Scher, Peter Max, Peter Saville, Pink Panther, Playboy Magazine, Pop Culture, Postmodernism, Print Design, Printing Technology, Psychedelia, Punk, punk style, Push Pin Studios, Queer Money, Ray Gun, Rob Cobb, rock, Rock Stickers, Ron Huage, Rongorongo, Rubber Stamp, Seattle Magazines, Set Design, Sex Pistols, Seymour Chwast, Shawn Kerri, silkscreen, Situationists, Starbird, Steve Albini, Swag, Swizzle Sticks, t-shirts, The Grunge Scene, The Rocket, Throbbing Gristle, Tibor Kalman, Todd Hignite, Tomata Du Plenty, Typography, UFOs, Von Dutch, Winston Smith

Spheric Dialogues

by James Jarvis

Not a Thing At All

Spheric Dialogues

by James Jarvis

Analytic of the Beatiful

Weekly Yokoyama

by Yuichi Yokoyama

Flagging